Friday, December 9, 2011

And what about that whole freedom of speech thing?

The blood-boiler of a headline is "Criticism of Islam Could Soon be a Crime in America".  Ms Clinton is to get a visit from the head of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) this month.  On the agenda - how the US can implement the OIC agenda to criminalize criticism of Islam.  This would be the same OIC that adopted the Cairo Declaration +20 years ago, said Cairo Declaration exempting Muslim countries from compliance with the UN Universal Declaration on Human Rights.  Not surprising - rights aren't a big concern in the dream of an Islamic Caliphate ruled under shariah law.

As Salmon Rushdie found out, "slander" is a big deal in shariah.  And since the OIC views anything a Muslim doesn't like to hear as slander and therefore as Islamophobia, it wants the U.N. to "...adopt an international resolution to counter Islamophobia" and to "call upon all States to enact laws to counter it, including deterrent punishments."

Let's see now:  on Nov. 5, 2009, one Major Hasan, who had been in regular contact with terrorist Anwar al-Awlaki, yelled "ALLAHU AKHBAR" as he slaughtered 13 and wounded 32 at Ft. Hood, TX.  The administration has classified that event as "workplace violence".  Think the head of the OIC will have a warm welcome when he knocks on Hillary's door?

Victim of "work place violence" at Ft. Hood

The article aptly closes:

A phobia is an irrational fear. It is not irrational to give warning of an ideology resolutely committed to eradication of free belief, expression, speech, and even thought. It is suicidal for a free society willingly to collaborate with those, like the Muslim Brotherhood and the OIC, which are determined to destroy Western civilization from within—and have told us so, repeatedly, consistently, and publicly. Further, collaboration in such an anti-freedom campaign represents abrogation of the professional oath of office of every federal official who has sworn to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Silencing those who would warn of impending catastrophe only ensures victory to the enemy and loss of our most rare and precious inheritance: the American love of liberty.

I'm sorry, but if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then I'm going to call it a duck, no matter what some p.c. nimnul declares.

The full article can be read here.

6 comments:

  1. If it's quacking, it's getting shot... Just sayin...

    ReplyDelete
  2. We ARE at war with the Muslims. Treat them like the citizens of enemy nations that they are.

    Screw it - I stereotype, discriminate, and profile. I celebrate the diversity of being an American citizen - not as one submissive to Allah.

    So be it.
    Q

    ReplyDelete
  3. Someone somewhere is going to Google "Is a Mallard taken with steel shot Halal?"
    and they're going to end up at this post.

    Saweet!

    ReplyDelete
  4. We need to wake up to who the enemy really is

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Old NFO - If it's quacking "Allahu akhbar!" fire away!

    @quizikle - Diversity is one thing, turning your back on a rabid dog is something completely different.

    @kx59 - Thanks.

    @MSgt B - LOL!

    @fuzzys dad - We need to understand that there always has been a radical form of Islam and that our wishing it weren't so won't make it go away.

    ReplyDelete